Key Takeaways:

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued two new guides for platforms and marketers to help ensure transparency in online reviews and address soliciting, moderating, and reporting reviews, and the use of third-party “reputation boosting” services.
  • The FTC has actively enforced against companies responsible for publishing deceptive reviews and blocking honest reviews, and recently announced a proposed $4.2 million settlement with online retailer Fashion Nova over the retailer’s practice of review-gating.

Customer reliance on online reviews of products and services has become a cornerstone of the online shopping experience. However, businesses that abuse customer trust by writing fake reviews or erasing legitimate negative reviews may open themselves up to allegations of deceptive “review-gating” practices.

In January, the FTC published two new guides: Soliciting and Paying for Online Review: A Guide for Marketers (Marketer Guide) and Featuring Online Customer Reviews: A Guide for Platforms (Platform Guide). The Marketer Guide focuses on companies that seek to increase the number of reviews for their products and services on third-party websites and platforms. It provides guidance about how to solicit reviews from customers and use third-party “reputation boosting” services that provide expert reviews and comparisons. The Platform Guide advises that operators of a website or platform that feature reviews should favor transparency in reviews, identify incentives between sellers and reviewers, treat positive and negative reviews equally, have procedures in place to spot fake or deceptive reviews, and provide effective reporting mechanisms for consumers and businesses to use when they detect fake and otherwise non-compliant reviews.

The FTC has actively enforced against companies responsible for publishing deceptive reviews and blocking honest reviews. Recently, the FTC announced a proposed settlement with online retailer Fashion Nova for $4.2 million to settle allegations that the company blocked negative product reviews from being posted on its website. This was the first case brought by the FTC related to a failure to post negative reviews. According to the complaint, Fashion Nova utilized a third-party product review system that required company approval for customers to post negative reviews. While four- and five-star reviews were posted automatically, hundreds of thousands of negative reviews were not posted. Fashion Nova denied that it intended to suppress negative reviews, stating that the issue was caused by the third-party vendor and an issue with the “autopublish” feature. As part of the settlement, Fashion Nova also agreed not to misrepresent customer reviews or other endorsements.

The FTC also announced that it is sending letters to 10 companies, placing them on notice that refusal to automatically publish negative reviews violates the FTC Act. See FTC sample letter here.

The new Marketer and Platform Guides, along with the letters sent to companies potentially engaged in “review-gating,” is just another indicator that FTC is using a variety of tactics to prevent deception in online advertising.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jason Howell Jason Howell

Jason Howell serves as co-chair of the Advertising, Marketing & Promotions practice and as a member of the Trademark, Copyright & Media practice.

Photo of Amanda Beane Amanda Beane

Amanda Beane serves as co-chair of the Advertising, Marketing & Promotions practice.

Photo of Mark S. Goodrich Mark S. Goodrich

Mark Goodrich provides guidance on a variety of advertising compliance matters and helps brands navigate complex state, federal and local advertising, promotion and consumer protection laws. Mark’s experience includes counseling related to claim substantiation, endorsements and testimonials, deceptive pricing, discount or coupon offers…

Mark Goodrich provides guidance on a variety of advertising compliance matters and helps brands navigate complex state, federal and local advertising, promotion and consumer protection laws. Mark’s experience includes counseling related to claim substantiation, endorsements and testimonials, deceptive pricing, discount or coupon offers, negative option or “automatic renewal” of subscriptions, cause marketing, online disclosures, intellectual property rights, free offers, native advertising, and other Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules and guidelines. He also frequently drafts rules for contests, sweepstakes and related games, and provides counsel on how to structure promotions to comply with state and federal laws.

Photo of Nathan Kosnoff Nathan Kosnoff

Nathan Kosnoff has experience working on a broad range of matters, including intellectual property and trademark disputes, antitrust, construction defect litigation, campaign finance law, and government and internal investigations.